Colorado voters face $10,000 choice on constitutional hunting rights

Colorado residents head to the polls on Tuesday to decide if hunting and fishing require constitutional protection. The vote determines whether these activities gain the same legal weight as other fundamental rights. A 'yes' vote would change how wildlife rules are written and enforced in the state.

The amendment, known as Amendment 83, faces a high bar for passage. Because it alters the state constitution, it needs at least 55% of the vote to succeed. Polls close at 7 p.m., with early results expected shortly after that time.

The proposal elevates hunting and fishing from statutory protection to a constitutional right. It designates these activities as the preferred method for managing wildlife populations. The text also allows for the use of traditional methods and restricts when state agencies can change regulations.

Supporters, including major out-of-state hunting groups, argue the change defends the sport from future ballot measures and regulatory shifts. They view the constitutional language as a shield against legislative changes that might limit access to the outdoors.

Opponents, backed by national animal rights groups, warn the amendment will complicate wildlife management. They argue it ties the hands of Colorado Parks and Wildlife staff who must adapt rules to changing conditions. Critics predict the new status will lead to lengthy and expensive court challenges.

Money played a major role in the campaign. Out-of-state hunting groups donated millions to the petition drive and the campaign for passage. National animal rights organizations responded with hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight the measure. If approved, Colorado will join 24 other states with similar constitutional language.